Wednesday, 1 September 2010

The Benefits of Wireless Fire Alarm Systems

Radio or wireless fire alarm systems first became available in the early 1980’s. In these early days of radio, the early radio or wireless fire alarm systems began to gain a poor reputation for reliability, mainly related to the radio transmissions and battery life of the devices and poor fire alarm design.  However over time the technology involved in these fire systems has steadily advanced to where we are today.  Today’s Radio or Wireless Fire Alarm Systems are light years ahead of their early 80’s ancestors.  Interestingly the advance in technology with the radio fire alarm systems has occurred as a bi-product of major advances in technology in the computer, battery and mobile phone industries.  Radio Fire Alarm System designers and engineers have embraced and harnessed this new technology to create and manufacture a new generation of radio fire alarm systems that are much more sophisticated in terms of performance, fault monitoring and reliability.  These new systems are fully compliant to BS5839 and EN54 and are fully monitored.

One of the main benefits of A Radio Fire Alarm System is that they reduce the needs to install cabling to each individual device on the fire alarm system.  Modern radio fire alarm systems will only need cables to be installed to the control and signal booster panel positions to provide a mains supply.  This benefit of radio fire alarm systems means that have been ideally suited to listed type buildings.  It allows the installation of a fully functioning fire alarm system within the building while not ‘running’ cables where it is impractical to do so.  Examples of installations of this type are in Windsor Castle and The Ritz Hotel, both of which have radio fire alarm systems installed.  In some instances conservation bodies would also prohibit the installation of cables within protected buildings and radio fire alarm systems may be the only solution to allow the building to comply with current regulations and standards.

No comments:

Post a Comment